In Denial of Weight Gain (often abbreviated as "In Denial of WG") is a roleplay-based kink within the feederism spectrum. It centers on a person who has gained weight, or is in the process of gaining weight, while verbally or behaviorally denying that the weight gain is happening. This denial can be genuine self-deception played out in fantasy, or a scripted performance agreed upon with a partner. The kink typically involves one person (the denier) insisting that their body has not changed, that clothing still fits, or that they have not eaten more than usual, while a partner (often a feeder or observer) gently or teasingly points out evidence to the contrary. The contrast between reality and the denier's claims is the core erotic element. The appeal lies in a mix of themes including body awareness, vulnerability, humiliation (light or intense depending on preference), and the psychological tension between self-image and physical reality. It can be practiced with actual weight gain or kept entirely in fantasy and roleplay without any real body change.
In practice, In Denial of WG plays out as a scripted or semi-improvised scene between partners. The denier might squeeze into clothes that no longer fit and insist they fit perfectly, claim they haven't eaten much despite evidence to the contrary, or dismiss a partner's observations about their body with deflection or mock offense. The partner responding to the denial typically plays along by gently or firmly contradicting the denier, drawing attention to specific physical details or behaviors that contradict the denial.
Scenes can range from light and comedic to psychologically intense. Some people enjoy the humor and absurdity of the denial itself. Others are drawn to the vulnerability of being "caught" in the denial, which can carry mild to moderate humiliation themes. Some practitioners use mirrors, clothing try-ons, or weigh-ins as scene props to heighten the contrast.
The dynamic does not require actual weight gain. Many people run the scenario entirely in fantasy, using imagination, storytelling, or descriptive language rather than real body changes. When real weight gain is involved, it is because both partners have independently chosen that path and have folded the denial element in as an added layer of roleplay. What draws people to this kink is often the interplay between self-image and external perception, body awareness, and the eroticism of being seen closely by a partner.
Clear, ongoing consent is essential. Both partners must agree on tone before play begins, specifically whether the dynamic leans toward affectionate teasing or more explicit humiliation, since the line between them is personal and can shift. Avoid language about health or attractiveness that either partner has not pre-approved. If real weight gain is involved, both individuals should independently manage their own physical wellbeing without pressure from a partner. Establish a safeword or check-in signal so the denier can pause or stop the dynamic at any time. Debrief after sessions to catch any emotional discomfort that surfaces during or after play.
No. Many people engage with denial of WG entirely through imagination, descriptive roleplay, or collaborative storytelling. The fantasy and the psychological dynamic can be fully present without any real physical change.
Standard feederism focuses on the act of feeding and the erotic charge around eating and weight gain itself. Denial of WG adds a specific psychological layer where the person gaining weight rejects or ignores the evidence of that change, and the tension between denial and reality is the primary erotic element.
Preparation helps a lot. Agreeing on specific phrases, behaviors, and scenarios in advance lets both partners improvise within a clear frame. Some couples write loose scripts or discuss key beats before a scene so the denial feels natural rather than forced.
Like any roleplay that involves body commentary, it is worth checking in regularly about how both partners feel emotionally outside of scenes. If the themes start bleeding into everyday self-perception in unwanted ways, pausing and talking openly, or speaking with a therapist, is a reasonable step.
Yes, mismatched enthusiasm around a specific kink is common. What matters is that the less-enthusiastic partner is genuinely willing and not uncomfortable. Doing something purely to please a partner without any personal buy-in is fine as long as it does not feel coercive or unpleasant for them.
Common elements include comments about clothing fit, references to eating habits, playful or pointed observations about body measurements, and the denier offering increasingly implausible excuses. The specific language should be negotiated in advance so neither partner uses words or comparisons that the other finds genuinely hurtful rather than erotically charged.
Reviewed by Reviewed by the Jar of Kinks editorial team